Indiana-based artist Tasha Lewis transforms the Conservatory’s gallery with thousands of magnetic cyanotype butterflies printed on cotton fabric. Her blue butterflies hover in mid-air and seem to swarm the space, blurring the connection between the natural and artificial worlds.
GOP Chair Denies Involvement In Libertarian Challenge
Listen to the Story
The Chairman of Ohio’s Republican Party denies he or his party is behind the challenges to Libertarian Candidate Charlie Earl’s candidacy.
Earl says those statement made in federal court on Monday could be important in the future.
Ohio Republican Party Chairman Matt Borges was emphatic in his denials that he or his party had anything to do with the decision to disqualify Libertarian Gubernatorial candidate Charlie Earl from the primary last week.
The court proceedings were not allowed to be recorded for re-broadcast but Jeremy Pelzer, a reporter with the Northeast Ohio Media Group, was observing Borges as he made his statements.
“He denied all questions about involvement about Ohio Republicans in the challenges. He denied that the party sought out any challengers to Earl’s petitions,” Pelzer said.
“He denied any party money was paid to help the legal fees for the challengers. He basically said anyone who is looking for the conspiracy behind this, it’s just not there.
Borges also said he misspoke when he initially told reporters late last month that the Ohio GOP did have a role in the challenges. Charlie Earl says Borges didn’t say anything unexpected in this hearing.
“I have not seen that much excrement in one location for such a short time in a long time, since I left my Dad’s farm,” Earl said after the hearing. “And we knew he’d be evasive and we knew he knows nothing but we’ve got it on the record so that if something pops up that impeaches his testimony, we aren’t going after the party, we are going after him personally, too.”
The Libertarians’ case also argues Secretary of State Husted’s ruling violates the first amendment rights of petition circulators and notes conflicts with previous state rulings that allow petition collectors to submit signatures without identifying their employers.
The court is expected to rule on the matter later this week.