Sullivant’s Travels is a site-specific journey through the mind of a building – namely Ohio State’s newly renovated Sullivant Hall, home to the university’s dance department. World-renowned director and choreographer Stephan Koplowitz developed eleven simultaneous performance elements featuring artists from OSU’s Department of Dance, School of Music and Advanced Computing Center for the Arts and [...]
AG Candidate: Office Shouldn’t “Defend Constitutional Violations”
The Democratic candidate for Ohio Attorney General says if elected this November, heâ€™ll make voting rights a key priority of his office.
Attorney General candidate David Pepper says heâ€™d create a unit within the attorney generalâ€™s Civil Rights Division to investigate reports of voter intimidation, suppression or fraud. He says heâ€™d also inform legislators if a bill created voting restrictions he found to be unconstitutional.
And he says if the general assembly passes new voting rules laws he concludes are unconstitutional, heâ€™ll file a court brief saying soâ€”and he says in some cases he may decline to defend them in court.
â€œIf the legislature is violating the constitutional rights of your citizens, the attorney general doesnâ€™t simply blindly defend constitutional violations,” Pepper says. “The attorney general as a separate officeholder has the duty to speak out on behalf of citizensâ€™ constitutional rights.â€
Current Attorney General Mike DeWine agrees he can speak out against laws he finds unconstitutional. But he says itâ€™s the AGâ€™s job to defend state law.
â€œYou always have an obligation to defend the state,” DeWine says.
“What we did in one particular case where we felt that the law was unconstitutional, clearly unconstitutional, my office still defended that case.â€
That case involved a law against false elections advertising. While his office defended the law, DeWine also filed a friend-of-the-court brief questioning its constitutionality.
Pepper says heâ€™d have done the same thing with laws limiting early voting hours in 2012, and changing ballot access rules for third parties.
DeWineâ€™s office helped defend those, but didnâ€™t protest their constitutionality, and judges later blocked them â€“ though DeWine has appealed the ruling on third parties.