Four people are dead in two separate accidents in Central Ohio. In Pataskala, investigators say a head-on collision on East Broad took three lives. One vehicle crossed the center line. Early this morning, the driver of a pick-up truck was killed when he slammed into a tree in a residential area south of Route 104 [...]
State Rep. Pushes Bill To Shrink Ohio’s Medicaid Program
Listen to the Story
While Governor John Kasich says heâ€™s working with lawmakers to expand Medicaid to more Ohioansâ€¦ one legislator is proposing a plan that would dramatically cut eligibility.
â€œMy question has been â€˜why are we spending a lot of taxpayer money for an inefficient and ineffective program thatâ€™s well above federal minimums,” says Republican Rep. John Becker of Southwest Ohio.
The lawmaker plans to formally introduce a bill next week that would change Medicaid rolls for parents, pregnant women, and those on the buy-in system.
Currently, parents in Ohio are eligible for Medicaid if theyâ€™re earning at or below 90 percent of the federal poverty level.
Beckerâ€™s plan would drop that to 34 percent.
For pregnant women, that threshold would go from 200 percent of the poverty level to 133 percent.
And the stateâ€™s Medicaid buy-in program for workers with disabilities would be cut altogether.
Ohioâ€™s Office of Medicaid did not have a comment regarding Beckerâ€™s plan.
The representative says this proposal is just one way of addressing what he believes is an overall problem with federal government programs.
For one thingâ€”whenever youâ€™re spending somebody elseâ€™s money which of course is what youâ€™re doing with any government program youâ€™re reaching into one personâ€™s wallet and giving money to somebody else.
“You know I just have some general philosophical problems with that, and whenever itâ€™s done it does give me pause.â€
Becker adds that the federal government is on an unsustainable path of spending that could ultimately lead to bankruptcy. If the state goes with his plan Becker says it would save $1.5 billion.
He wants to go down to the bare minimum which puts us in Charles Dickens England in terms of health care policy, throwing us back to a time when low-income families went without basic health coverage. -Cathy Levine, Ohio Consumers for Health Coverage.
Levine says Becker’s plan would impact hundreds of thousands of people. She says taking away health care that could cover preventive measures would only amount to more medical problems later down the road and this is merely shifting the cost.
â€œWhen you take away health coverage you save the money youâ€™re paying upfront but you pay for health care usually in more expensive places.
“People who donâ€™t get prenatal care are more likely to give birth to children who need a lifetime of care and will receive that care at far greater costs.
â€œSo yeahâ€”she does make a valid point,” Becker responds, “but what I come back to is if you look at the whole Medicaid program, itâ€™s probably the worst devised federal program ever in existence. And it is so wrought with fraud, abuse, corruption and waste just the thought of expanding or doubling down and all thatâ€”Iâ€™m just frankly repulsed by the idea.â€
Becker admits that his plan could increase costs in other areas but adds that no one knows just how much that would be.
Levine has been on the front lines advocating for Medicaid expansion. She says the health care industry agrees that eligibility should increaseâ€¦ adding that Beckerâ€™s proposal is a purely political move that shouldnâ€™t be taken seriously.
â€œThe General Assembly is not going to vote to take health coverage away from pregnant women, women newly diagnosed with breast and cervical cancer, people with disabilities and low-income parents whose health is essential for the well-being of their children.
“This is an incredibly mean-spirited move if it were taken seriously but I donâ€™t think itâ€™s serious,” Levine says.
Becker says his bill might not get consideration as a standalone measure but hopes it adds to the bigger conversation about Medicaid expansion.