Should Metro Parks Rangers Carry Firearms?

Listen to the Story

Vinnie Billow manages Sharon Woods Metro Park
Vinnie Billow manages Sharon Woods Metro Park

Comprised of nearly 25,000 acres, central Ohio’s Metro Parks system employs almost 50 rangers and law enforcements officers. But none of them is allowed to carry a firearm. That policy, however, is now under review.

The Sharon Woods Metro Park in Westerville is 760 acres of woods and open fields. The park’s trails are popular with walkers and joggers. Schrock Lake is the park’s centerpiece.

Vinnie Billow is driving one of the Metro Parks’ specially marked patrol vehicles. He manages Sharon Woods Park, but before that he was a Metro Parks ranger.

“My primary responsibility [is] mostly customer service oriented,” Billow says. “Strong visual presence throughout the park so we’re approachable to the public and it also is quite a nice tool to deter crime because if the bad guys see us on patrol on a regular basis they’re a whole lot less likely to come in here and want to do bad things.”

Billow is a fully-trained and commissioned peace officer with the same authority and arrest powers as the police. He wears a law officer’s badge but he and the other rangers in the central Ohio Metro Parks system don’t carry firearms. That’s been a long-standing policy says Metro Parks executive director John O’Meara who notes that crime in the parks is extremely rare.

“When you think that we have 7.5 million visitors a year, we have very few incidents,” O’Meara says. “We’ve had very few crimes; we’ve had car break-ins; that does happen, and those are occasional, certainly not more common than in the malls, but it does happen.”

Metro Parks rangers unionized in 2009. Now the Ohio Fraternal Order of Police is pushing to arm the rangers. Tracy Rader represents the Fraternal Order’s labor council.

“Management was very anti-guns,” Rader says. “They believed that customer service was most important to the people coming to the parks and that being armed was not a necessity. We disagree with that.”

So the labor council has been lobbying the three-member park board of commissioners for a change in the anti-gun policy. Again labor council representative Tracy Rader.

“We look at what’s going on across the United States with deranged people that are showing up in places that you would never expect people to show up and kill people,” Rader says. “And we’re concerned that if someone would show up to the parks with the intent to kill that we would not be able to serve the park people as we would if we were armed.”

Earlier this week the Metro Parks board agreed to commission a study as to the feasibility of arming rangers. Executive Director John O’Meara says it may be time for a change.

“I’m not opposed to change if change is the right thing; I’m willing to take a good look at this,” O’Meara says. “I believe that the system we have has worked very well, but maybe the times are changing and we need to look at other alternatives.”

O’Meara does question whether the park system, which he says has experienced funding cuts in recent years, can afford to modify its no-gun policy.

“You have to start thinking that if they have weapons, how do you keep them safe? Most places that have park rangers go to different types of vehicles. We might end up buying significantly more vehicles. Ultimately it could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars,” O’Meara says.

That said, Executive Director O’Meara insists that the safety of visitors and employees is the park system’s top priority. To the labor council’s Tracy Rader, money should not be the determining factor.

“They can’t afford not to arm these guys. They can’t,” Rader says.
The park board will issue a request for proposals to study the issue. O’Meara says the ultimate decision rests with the board of commissioners.

  • hogleg

    Hes a manager not a ranger

  • Joe

    Vinnie Billow is a park manager not a park ranger. If John O’mera said the moon was made of cheese vinnie billow would agree with him. Don’t be naive Metro Parks. Anyone can do “customer service”. Your rangers need to be armed.

  • Dustin Harding

    Park rangers don’t need to be armed to do their jobs, for the same reasons that pilots, school teachers, and bus drivers don’t need to be armed: policing is only a small part of their job. Crime in the metro parks is very low and violent crime is almost nonexistent. Do we really want some ranger reaching for their holster every time someone gets caught fishing without a license or teenagers get caught littering? But the big question is: why now and who really stands to benefit?

  • cosmonot1

    I’ve witnessed rampant theft of pine cones and misc indiscernible wild plants. People parking with reckless abandon and wearing clothes revealing too much cake fall out. Arm these rangers with assault type weapons and they can also serve as riot police in the event of an animal uprising.

  • Robert Rodriguez

    They should ask for that money back. You asked a consultation firm, from Chicago, to come in and make a suggestion on what should be done about park safety in Ohio.??? Correct me if I’m wrong here but isn’t the murder rate in Chicago one of the highest in the country? Whoever hired this particular firm needs to be fired. I always thought Ohio was a fairly reasonable and, for the most part, pretty smart about adhering to the U.S. Constitution and allowing the people to arm themselves…you’ll allow civilians to carry guns into parks, but the people who enforce the park laws get nothing? Come on, we have to be smarter than that don’t we? Most folks don’t understand the amount of crime park rangers really deal with, there’s a lot of illegal activity that goes on most people aren’t aware of.