Political Campaigns May Never End

Listen to the Story

Campaign volunteers continue to push for their issues.(Photo: Debbie Holmes)
Campaign volunteers continue to push for their issues.(Photo: Debbie Holmes)

Six weeks after Ohio helped re-elect President Obama, the campaign supporting and opposing his policies continues. Their current target is negotiations over how to avoid automatic tax hikes and spending cuts. Some say campaigning should end on Election day, while others say engaged citizens are what democracy is all about.

Neighborhood Team Leader of Ward 18 in Clintonville, Mike McLaughlin organized Barack Obama supporters all summer and fall. Even though the election is over, he’s still organizing, hosting a call to action meeting with community volunteers earlier this month.

“To have 12 people come to an impromptu meeting on Sunday to pick up postcards to circulate them. They knew what the job was. It was a short hour meeting. It was purely procedural; this is what we’re doing. But to have 12 people show up and take postcards and say yes I’ll have them back to you in a week is very, very encouraging,” says McLaughlin.

McLaughlin says he and the volunteers are trying to preserve tax cuts for 98% of the U.S. population. He says the postcards will be sent to Congressmen Steve Stivers who currently represents the area, and Pat Tiberi who will be the new representative for Ward 18. U.S. senators Rob Portman and Sherrod Brown will also get postcards from the group.

Former state director of the Obama for America campaign in Ohio, Greg Schultz says the volunteers know how to organize on their own.

“The Obama organizing style is not dependent on staff and not dependent on fixed offices. It’s a very decentralized approach where you put a lot of power and influence in volunteer leaders,” says Schultz.

The Obama campaign had more than 140 offices across Ohio, but Schultz says while those shut down after the election, volunteers remain connected with home bases.

Schultz adds online tools like Facebook and Twitter enable President Obama to promote issues with community volunteers.

“Some of them have their own Facebook page where they give updates or they have twitter handles on twitter where they’ll tweet their successes to their other neighbors and really encourage one another. So not only is it a way to get information out, but it’s also a way to mobilize,” says Schultz.

Ohio State political science professor Paul Beck finds the Obama campaign used some of the same tools as previous presidential campaigns, but their volunteers organized for the long-term.

“The idea was that you don’t have just a six month or a one year campaign for office; for any office, but politicians, people who are in office are campaigning all the time. And so they are keeping people in place; they are raising money all the time. That’s less the case for a President in his second term,” Beck says.

 Lincoln Park, a former housing project on the far south side of Columbus.

Tom Zawistowski is president of the Ohio Liberty Coalition, made up of conservative groups that include the Tea Party. He worries that Ohio voters will be subjected to an endless campaign.

“We are just bombarded with these election campaigns that seem to be never ending as it is and what in effect the left is doing is they’re in permanent campaign mode and if the right does the same thing I’m not sure how much we want that,” says Zawistowski.

However he admits conservatives must pay attention.

“It’s a positive thing for the campaign. We don’t know if it’s a positive thing for citizens, but because it worked, I think you’re going to see not only them continuing it, but I think you’re going to see people on the right emulating it. So, you’re going to have a lot more activity four years before the presidential election on both sides,” adds Zawistowski.

Neighborhood volunteer Mike McLaughlin says his group will take their efforts on issues door to door if necessary.

“Liberty is eternal vigilance and we need to keep the fire to the feet of these elected representatives so they do the will of the people,” says McLauglin.

And OSU’s Paul Beck says strong voices get heard by elected leaders.

“One thing that really is powerful as an influence is the feeling that a lot of people are behind a particular cause and politicians take note of that. They take note of the letters and emails and other messages they’re getting in their offices,” Beck explains.

  • workerbee

    I think more than 2% of the population will be impacted our countries inability to control spending. There is a 3.8% medicare tax coming 1/2013 on rental & investment income for all tax payers with incomes over $125,000 single – $250,000 couples/ This tax is already approved as part of health care reform REGARDLESS of Bush tax cut expiration. Rents will continue to rise as the costs trickle down. A self employed couple earning $250,000+ earnings now taxed at 33%- social security tax – 15.3%- State of Oh 6%- City of Columbus- 2.5% and hit with an AMD if they have too many deductions. But those taxes are not “enough”. Our country has a mess of a budget on it’s hands and the shortsighted solution is tax upon tax upon tax.

    • emptynextmom

      The Medicare investment tax on upper income people is not as high as one might conclude from your post. You say single tax payers with income over $125,000 will pay the Medicare investment tax on rental and investment income. Actually the figure for single tax payers is $200,000. More importantly, you have left out a very important point. The 3.8% Medicare investment tax is only paid on the PORTION of the investment income that brings the total adjusted gross income (AGI) to over $250,000 couples/$200,000 singles/$125,000 married filing singly. So, a married couple whose adjusted gross income is $265,000 with $60,000 of that coming from investment and/or rental income, does not pay the 3.8% Medicare investment tax on the $60,000 of investment/rental income, as one might conclude from your post. Instead, the couple pays the 3.8% Medicare tax only on $15,000, the portion of the $60,000 that puts the AGI over $250,000. I think it’s reasonable, prudent, and affordable for a couple earning a net adjusted gross income of $265,000 with $60,000 of that from investments, to pay 0.038 x $15,000 = $570 per year so their waiter, (or retail clerk or babysitter, etc. ) has health care and can get antibiotics for his or her strep throat in a timely fashion and therefore is much less likely to pass on that strep to the $265,000 a year family. (Actually the couple would pay $705 per year in new Obamacare Medicare taxes as there is also a 0.09% regular (non-investment) Medicare income tax on income over $250,000 for joint filers, still a reasonable, prudent, and affordable amount for a $265,000 AGI couple). The figures in the example are from http://www.smartmoney.com/taxes/income/what-obamacare-may-mean-for-taxes-1335896160486/