The federal government recommends demolishing over 200 buildings at the site of a former Cold War-era uranium plant in southern Ohio.
National Weather Service Tests New “Impact” Warning
Listen to the Story
Wednesday, Franklin County will conduct its weekly Tornado warning test. Weâ€™re getting more of these warnings, causing some to worry the sirensâ€™ effectiveness is wearing off. Thatâ€™s why the National Weather Service is testing a series of new, attention-grabbing warnings.
If itâ€™s Wednesday at noon, you can expect to hear the tornado sirens. The sirens are tested each week to make sure theyâ€™ll work in the event of a real threat. Theyâ€™ve sounded three times this year in Franklin County for real warnings and 42 times across the state.
Since 2007, the number of tornado warnings issued for Ohio has tripled. The reasons why are pretty simple: more severe weather and better technology.
But because weâ€™re hearing the warnings more often experts admit theyâ€™re becoming less effective.
â€œThe county is very large so I tend to go to a weather station first to find out where it is. So, seriously enough to check, but not seriously enough to dash to the basement,” Johanna McKenzie, of Columbus, said.
Rachel White, also of Columbus, said does not take tornado warnings very seriously, “Because most of the time it never amounts to anything…it seems like so many instances of like them going off and nothing happens. Like, there it goes again, another day.â€
That ambivalence is even worse in Plains states which can experience hundreds of tornadoes a year. Meteorologists call it â€œcar alarmâ€ syndrome, where something is heard so often it becomes background noise.
A storm last spring provided a tragic illustration. Last May, a tornado warning was issued for Joplin, Missouri. As the tornado moved toward the city, it intensified to an EF 5, the most violent kind. Not everyone heeded the warning, and 160 people died.
To try to overcome complacency in Tornado Alley, the National Weather Service is trying out a new warning system in Kansas and Missouri.
â€œThe intent is not to scare, but it is to inform,” Meteorologist Mike Hudson said.
Hudson is chief operations officer at the Kansas City National Weather Service. He read the most severe warning.
â€œThis is a life threatening situation. You could be killed if not underground or in a tornado shelter. Complete destruction of entire neighborhoods is likely. Many well built homes and businesses will be completely swept from their foundations. Debris will block most roadways. Mass devastation is likely making the area unrecognizable to survivors.â€
Hudson hopes the impact based warnings will help people relate to a stormâ€™s potential.
Not all warnings will sound as intense as the one in this report. A catastrophic tornado warning will be reserved for Joplin-like tornadoes that have been confirmed on the ground. The other impact based warnings describe situations of significant building damage, uprooted trees or roads blocked by debris.
Columbus is not Tornado Alley. And the old warning system remains in place here.
About 70 percent of the time tornado warnings are false alarms. Thatâ€™s because the current radars allow the National Weather Service to issue a tornado warning about 13 minutes before a tornado actually forms, if it ever does. Channel 4 Meteorologist Ben Gelber admits thereâ€™s a delicate balance between safety and crying wolf.
â€œThereâ€™s no guarantee a tornado will drop from the clouds, so you issue a warning to cover a wide area just because thereâ€™s that small chance, but a very real risk once rotation is established. Trouble is, the public has heard so many warnings that thereâ€™s a tendency to wait until something is dangerously close. And if you have a storm thatâ€™s moving at 40 or 50 mph that can be too late,” he said.
Gelber said the only answer to what he calls â€œcrying wolfâ€ warnings is a radar set to be at the weather serviceâ€™s finger tips later this year. Gelber said the new technology will give meteorologists a 3-D look inside a thunderstorm where tornadoes form.
â€œThe hope is that technology will reduce the number of warnings when nothing touches down. In other words, a forecaster will have a better since of a real risk of a rotation leading to a tornado,” Gelber said.
The National Weather Service could decide this fall if the new impact based warnings will be used everywhere.
Rachel White, who earlier said she does not heed tornado warnings, said an impact based warning might change her mind.
â€œYeah, that would definitely make me take it more seriously.”